Cholangioscopy; Evolution, Present & Future

  • Shaheena Parveen Department of Gastroenterology Sher I Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Soura Srinagar
  • Altaf Hussain Shah Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS
  • G M Gulzar Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS
  • Jaswinder Singh Sodhi Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS
  • Mushtaq Ahmad Khan Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS
  • Ankush Sharma Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS
  • Tariq Ahmad Mir Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS
Keywords: Cholangioscopy, ERCP, CBD

Abstract

The main burden of pancreatobiliary diseases is stones and strictures of varied aetiology. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a standard endoscopic intervention for biliary diseases has been established for decades for evaluating and managing biliary lesions with suspected malignancy, strictures, bile duct stones, cholangitis, and postsurgical complications like strictures and leakage.1-6

Due to the two-dimensional imaging in fluoroscopy, ERCP has also distinct limitations, especially for the characterization of biliary strictures and the differentiation between inflammatory, malignant, or fibrotic pathogenesis. In addition, tissue sampling by ERCP-directed brushing has a low sensitivity and specificity.7, 8 Furthermore, guide wire placement in complicated strictures, malignant stenosis, or after surgery can be difficult by using only fluoroscopy guidance. Similarly, in the case of CBD stones, stones above the stricture and large stones are also difficult to manage endoscopically. Transpapillar cholangioscopy allows direct visualization of the biliary system up to biliary branches of the second and third order.

The first generation of SOC was quite low in visualization quality due to a fibre optical probe. The introduction of the digital high-resolution cholangioscopy Spyglass DSTM (Boston Scientific Coro., Natick, MA, USA) in 2015 has achieved much better biliary endoscopic imaging quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shaheena Parveen, Department of Gastroenterology Sher I Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Soura Srinagar
  1. Shaheena Parveen

MD, DM

Assistant Professor

Department of Gastroenterology

Sher I Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences

Email: Shaheenaparveen2008@yahoo.com

Cell:9469664186

Altaf Hussain Shah, Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS

MD, DM, Professor and Head

 

G M Gulzar, Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS

MD, DM, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology

Jaswinder Singh Sodhi, Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS

MD, DM, Professor, 

Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS

MD, DM, Professor

 

Ankush Sharma, Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS

MD, Senior Resident

 

Tariq Ahmad Mir, Department of Gastroenterology, SKIMS

MD, Senior Resident

 

References

1. Paranandi B, Oppong KW. Biliary strictures:endoscopic assessment and management.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017; 8(2): 133–7.

2. Cotton PB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: maximizing benefits and
minimizing risks. GastrointestEndosc Clin NAm. 2012; 22(3): 587–99.

3 .de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, GundersonLL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers.
N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(18): 1368–78.

4. Singh A, Gelrud A, Agarwal B. Biliary strictures: diagnostic considerations and approach.
Gastroenterol Rep. 2015; 3(1): 22–31.

5.Verdonk RC, Buis CI, Porte RJ, van der JagtEJ, Limburg AJ, van den Berg AP, et al. Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: causes and consequences. Liver
Transpl. 2006; 12(5): 726–35.

6. Yasuda I, Itoi T. Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct
stones. Dig Endosc. 2013; 25(4): 376–85.

7. Fritcher EG, Kipp BR, Halling KC, Oberg TN,Bryant SC, Tarrell RF, et al. A multivariablemodel using advanced cytologic methods forthe evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliarystrictures. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(7): 2180–6.

8. Tieu AH, Kumbhari V, Jakhete N, OnyimbaF, Patel Y, Shin EJ, et al. Diagnostic and therapeuticutility of Spyglass® peroral cholangioscopyin intraductal biliary disease: single-centre,retrospective, cohort study. Dig Endosc.2015; 27: 479–85.
Published
2022-09-17
How to Cite
1.
Parveen S, Shah AH, Gulzar GM, Sodhi JS, Khan MA, Sharma A, Mir TA. Cholangioscopy; Evolution, Present & Future. jms [Internet]. 2022Sep.17 [cited 2026Oct.14];25(3):64-9. Available from: https://jmsskims.org/index.php/jms/article/view/1223
Section
Practice Point